Climate Change: Temporal And Spiritual
While those on the left have gone pretty much off the deep end
with Trump's formal announcement of his withdrawal from the Paris
Accords, the truth of the matter is that what Trump did matters a
lot less than his detractors say.
The Paris Agreement is by and large a voluntary agreement to cut
carbon emissions. You can read the whole
agreement here as non compliance has no consequences. If
fully implemented, regardless of what those on the left have to
say, it would have had a significant effect on America and her
energy sector (and prices) as well as other regulatory frameworks.
No one really felt the effects of the agreement because again, no
on really had to comply - it was a great feel good 'hug-a-tree'
We won't get into the politics of this today, rather I do want to
talk a bit about this whole debate and how it has been framed and
why Donald Trump is being beaten up so bad by those on the left.
First of all, the key issue that drove this agreement was the
whole theory; and it still is that,
a THEORY regardless of the heavily financed opinions of
'scientists' pushing the idea of anthropomorphic global
warming. That is a fancy word for man-made global warming or
rather, the earth is warming primarily because of human activity
on earth. This is the narrative that has been pushed forward by
many of the most powerful and important scientific organizations
in the world.
In this debate which is being conducted with the classic
instruments of information warfare, we would be wise to consider
carefully what we believe, why we believe it and whom
we have come to trust to tell us what the truth is. What is your
predisposition? What is it that you WANT to believe? That may be
the hardest question to answer.
Those on the left are immediately suspicious of those on the right
and vice versa. The big money flowing into think tanks, media
organizations and most importantly those highly trusted scientific
organizations which ordinary people have come to trust like the
Druids once did their priests. High Science has become the
neo-religion of our times. Now this is important so keep this in
mind going forward in this debate. Money will go to corrupt
those whom the world has come to trust the most.
Be it a politician, a religious leader or a scientific foundation.
No scientific research can be done without money and those with
money do decide what gets researched and which conclusions they
will continue to support and those that they will not. The power
of the purse in Science is equivalent to the power of religious
texts in religion. If you want to begin any journey to the truth
in our times and you fail to follow the money, you probably are on
the road to deceit. It's like an ancient mariner going to sea
without a compass or a modern one without a GPS. The guys from the
old days, stood a good chance of getting lost without his sextant.
Today, in a maze of information, misinformation and disinformation
we need that compass, that sextant and that GPS to help us
navigate the waters of our informational landscape.
When we follow the money we understand two things. Both sides are
heavily financed, but one side has been at this longer and has
been able to co-opt the scientific community from the beginning.
For lack of better words, I won't use 'left' and 'right' to
describe the opposing views, I will use the Soros crowd verses the
Exxon crowd. As I think this better typifies the debate. Those who
are getting their money from men like Soros and Prince
Philip and those who are getting their money from large oil
companies. I repeat that because I want you all to keep that in
mind as the weeks pass and the debate continues. This is all
classic information warfare and it is being waged as much by
governments as it is by wealthy interests who have a stake in the
outcome of the debate. Once we can get that and internalize it,
deconstructing this whole debate is far less difficult. But
another key to doing this is to not jump to
conclusions and to not have your mind made up
before you look at as much available data as time allows on both
sides of the debate. Additionally one must use a large dose of
common sense when analyzing it the data. People are smart when
they allow themselves to be. The problem is that
propaganda, political reflexes and often just plain on social
cowardice prevents people from looking at issues with a cold
analytical eye that allows them to think outside of the common
'heard mentality'. But breaking with that heard can in some cases
mean social isolation and thus many are overcome with fear, even
terror of thinking (really thinking) for themselves.
It is easier to let the TV do it for them. If you made up your
mind and don't want to be bothered with facts and thinking, then
go back to watching the comedy channel thinking it is news. There
is not much hope for you or millions like you.
This is not said to denigrate anyone who is truly concerned about
the environment. I know I am, very much. Rather it is to say this.
Let us ensure that we are trying to really fix the environment and
are not letting a few rich sons of you know what with billions to
spend putting forth a false narrative deceive us into spending our
time and efforts into a problem of theoretical significance when
other far, far more pressing problems of an environmental nature
that require no proof of existence are not dealt with. This leads
us all to a position where we are mis-allocatting resources and
effort and in the process do more harm than the theoretical good
they (claim to) want to fix.
There is a plethora of data available, some of it is indeed fake
data and it is not just coming from one side or the other. Both
sides are being rather liberal with data that is quite frankly not
as reliable as many think. The entire basis of the thesis of man
made global warming comes primarily from data that the pro-global
warming crowd 'destroyed'. This is one of the things that came out
during the climate-gate scandal. Though the media experts and
digital consultants have worked pretty hard to pull down
information on the web that tell us of this very inconvenient
fact. The search engines (often secretly run by the deep
state) have put tones of search spam in major engines that put all
the 'pro global warming' links and sites with top ranking. But the
guys who are not connected up with elitists, they can give you a better
non-emotional and factual look at this - without the spin.
Search engine disinformation - it is real and real people
spend many man hours in this new dis-informational discipline.
Rather than give all of you a long dissertation on this what I
will do is pass on some food for thought links to all of you, I
hope you at least get a chance to peruse some of them and then I
will say what follows. If I link more to the climate skeptic side
of things more than the climate 'religion' side - it is only
because for the most part anyone with a heartbeat has heard the
debate from the 'Al Gore' side of the debate and generally dismiss
out of hand the other side.
The Fix Is In
Warming Scare Is About Population Reduction (EIR - very
Warming Is Irreversable Say Experts
Amazing Arrogance of the Paris Climate Agreement
Abrupt Science Of Climate Change (quite interesting and
10 Scientists Refute Global Warming
This climate debate is about money. It's about economics and about
who gets to build factories and produce and those who are punished
for it. The plan is to use 'carbon emissions' as the deciding
factor. Those nations who have too high emissions (the western
developed world) will be punished. This whole debate was and
is really about building an international framework to manage the
world economy under the auspicious of the environment, or rather
'global environmental watchers'. Moreover it would have, if the
Paris Agreement were fully implemented, deeply effect (negatively)
sector (food production). Some nations are exempt
from emissions and others can increase them. What does this
do? Again, these are not 'dots' that the pro global warming crowd
want connected because if you did, you may begin to scratch your
head at the whole range of agreements and pseudo-scientific
consensus that has been heavily financed by billionaires who are
are pushing this.
The key to understand is that the money aspect of this is clouded
by the 'feel good' aspect that people have when they think they
are doing something positive for the earth. They are not following
the money. What happens when it becomes too expensive to operate a
factory in the US because of carbon emissions? I will tell you.
They will move to a country where they are allowed to
produce without that carbon emission problem. Again, this will
ultimately be about jobs, but no one is allowed to frame this
debate in this fashion.
But interestingly, Trumps move to get the US out of the Paris
Agreement has lined up both Big Oil and
an exit from the agreement.
What Do I think about Global Warming?
I am often asked that question as many think I am a 'climate
change denier'. Well I am not. I do think the climate on earth is
changing, doing so rapidly and some types of change (like
desertification) may be irreversible.
Under no circumstances do I think the climate is not changing.
From the polar region, to many parts of Africa, China and
elsewhere where we are seeing the process of desertification, only
a blind man or one who just is not in touch with reality would say
differently. The issue in my view is how much of this is really
man made and how much of it is due to climatic factors that are
out of our control (solar activity, a slowly shifting polar axis,
undersea volcanic activity, etc)?
My concern and it is a deep one is two fold. First, the emphasis
on global warming I think is a bit, if not totally misplaced. I
hear much more today about the heavily financed debate about
Global Warming and almost nothing about the real man-made
environmental disaster of Fukushima. People, most people don't
have a clue as to just what is going on there. Just how
bad it is and just what could result from that man made
disaster. In fact the way the Global press has been behaving, it
is more like a massive environmental coverup with the political
left just as guilty as the right.
Here you have a US designed nuclear reactor that has apparently
melted down (past tense) and is undergoing a nuclear chain
reaction that will go on for thousands of years, is emitting
radiation inside so hot that robots
go in and stop functioning. Since Fukushima, we have seen so
many mass dieoff's of fish, right along the currents that lead
right from Fukushima along the Canadian coast to the US west
coast. We have seen dozens of incidents and many of them with
literally thousands of dead sea creatures washing ashore. No one
is allowed to say the word 'Fukushima' in relation to this ongoing
and increasing phenomenon. The supposedly earth friendly corporate
moguls who preach the global warming gospel go silent on this
ongoing and clearly man made disaster and only cry their
'tears of sorrow' for the earth when it comes to the economically
significant 'global warming' debate. There have been many under
reported disasters taking place at the reactor at Fukushima. But
no one talks about it except the local stations where they happen.
The way I see this debate today is like this - A cow passes gas in
a pasture and panic ensues about greenhouse gases and global
warming; millions of fish die off in the ocean because of a
ongoing nuclear chain reaction that has tons of radioactive water
flowing into the sea and there is silence. This is classic
misdirection. However, with the global warming debate there
is also an opportunity to further the trends towards globalization
that have taken some major hits of late. The Paris Agreement is
but one step on a road toward increasing international
organizations (un-elected) sovereignty over the nation state
(often elected) and this is what we need to keep in mind. The
prevailing narrative of global warming is being so strongly pushed
by so many with money because they have a completely different
agenda that the one they go on camera and cry about. They are for
globalization. They are for creating and strengthening
international institutions that have little to no democratic input
so that they can manage the planet to their economic benefit. But
in order to do that they need various narratives to garner the
support needed to strengthen those organizations that will be used
to limit democratic input. Man made global warming was and is just
such a narrative. The actual truth of that narrative was
and still is immaterial, it's a footnote. The key is,
what can they get the masses of humanity to believe and what
'solutions' can they implement as a result. That is the key.
My view is that there may indeed be some man made global warming.
I am not dogmatic about it. I don't have the scientific background
to have a definite opinion. The data I have seen (and I have seen
quite a bit of it from both sides over a few years) leads me to
skepticism, not denial. The data available - so much of it
has been massaged by political hacks and 'computer models' that
appear to exaggerate the scope of purported warming and other
tricks to deceive the uninformed that frankly, I have come to
distrust any data coming out that is carried far and wide in your
major corporate media and politically charged sites and blogs.
Those of you who have formed a strong definite opinion about this
without a strong scientific background weather you are from the
left or right - you are being played for a sucker. When you get
such a strong background and have access to the data that is not
readily available, or has not been deliberately destroyed, perhaps
your opinion will matter. But an uninformed opinion is nothing
more than a high sounding phrase for ignorance and today, in our
so called information society, there is an epidemic of ignorance
So did Trump do right by withdrawing from the agreement? I don't
know. I think politically the way he did it was wrong and will
only energize his foes which are many. I do think he wanted to
talk to a lot of people before he made this decision. I know Al
Gore spent time talking with him about it and there were probably
others. I think the President did not want to make a rash decision
but wanted to listen to everyone before he made this decision I
think Mr. Gore and others had every opportunity to prove to
President Trump that Global warming was established fact. They
could not do it. One thing I have noted about Trump is that he is
capable of learning and listening. How much he really listened to
the other side is up for debate. But I think he is smart enough to
know what he does not know and can listen to those who do, or are
at least are supposed to.
The Media is doing its level best to call Trump's views
misinformed calling him out for calling Global Warming a 'Chinese
Hoax'. Well, I can tell you that it sure started out that way.
This was China all the way and there is a clear definite money
trail and other hard evidence to prove it, but that information
will not and probably never be allowed to come out.
The truth, the real truth dear readers is something most people
just cannot handle. They get angry and often have a real fit when
you tell them something that is true and assaults their
preconceived notions. If you want to know why our leaders often do
things that make little sense, this is often why. They know
things, and key aspects to problems that our world faces that you
are never ever going to hear and will be shouted down as
being false, even and especially by those who know it is
true. Sometimes it is because it could expose policies that are
not generally known, Sometime it is done to protect a narrative,
other times it is done to protect classified information (sources
and methods). If they start talking specifics then the sources you
had dry up or are found lying in a ditch with their brains blown
out. So they often cannot tell you the truth for the above state
reasons. But I can tell you that China was indeed behind the
whole Global warming scam from the get go many decades ago. They
carefully paid for, nurtured and carried the whole narrative so
that the west would regulate its industry out of business and
they would set up shop in China. Did it work? This is
something as well that many people don't understand. Often times
plans are set in motion and they don't work or don't work as well
as people think they would. Other times, they backfire. With China
this has worked but only up to a point. China did not used to emit
the kinds of pollution it does today. Now it accounts for around
30% of it. Anyone with an internet connection can see the kinds of
pollution in China. They have smog days there in some places that
look like a three alarm fire is taking place in the other room.
Over the past several years and it has become a bit of a crisis
there. My point? What started out as a kind of joke on the west
has been slowly coming to pass on China, perhaps not of the
'warming variety' but of a clear pollution variety. China as a
result, has modified its position.
For some readers they need to understand that when states and
wealthy men with a lot of influence embark on a policy, they often
look long range. China in particular does this very long range
kind of planing. It is all done in the 'covert' realm so that 999
out of a thousand people would never know what is going on, let
along line it up with a state or non-state actor and be called
nuts for seeing it and pointing it out. But these things happen.
We have plans, the Russians have plans, the Chinese... they all
plan for the future and in our 21st century world were warfare and
conflict are no longer confined to traditional armies,
understanding these new battle lines is key to understanding our
world. The problem in America is that there are many powerful
forces who are going to make absolutely sure that Americans never
really understand the world, except where they can be manipulated
into a deep political rage about something that may or may not
even be true in order to support a hidden agenda they don't even
And I saw three
unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the
and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth
of the false prophet.
For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles,
which go forth unto the
kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them
to the battle
of that great day of God Almighty.
(Revelation of John 16:13-14
"We have to protect Mother
(responding to Trump's
withdrawal from the Paris Accord)
The Climate debate however goes far beyond just temperature
models, climate agreements and a carbon tax. There are enormous
implications in this debate that only a few have the guts to
cover. In the EIR link above, Executive Intelligence Review does a
decent job in their teaser of showing you that there are other
forces who have other agenda's hope to use the debate to further
those agendas. It is not just Prince's in England, but also the
Pope in Rome, who has gathered key earth worshipers to advise him.
One key advisor is Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, he is the Pope's
main advisor on these matters.
Hans Joachim “John”
Schellnhuber, radical environmentalist and global warming
advisor to Chancellor Merkel of Germany. He was the star of
the Vatican press conference presenting the new encyclical in
support of the global warming theory . Schellnhuber has
just been named as a member of the Papal Academy of Sciences
in the Vatican, despite the fact that he is an atheist. Some
observers class Schellnhuber as a scientific pantheist. He
embraces the Gaia theory of James Lovelock, according to which
the earth is a living thing, locked in an existential struggle
with the destructive forces of Shiva. - Voltaire.net
This is where the rubber meets the road for Christians who know
their God and understand the times, which are in reality only a very
few in number. Most Christians don't understand the real fault
lines. They don't get it. Why is that? I will tell you in one
simple sentence. They don't believe God. They say they do,
recite some childish Jesus loves me versus but never grow up
beyond the kindergarten version of Christianity.
Let me put it to you another way. These pantheists? These
followers of the Gaia Religion? These occultists who push some of
these agenda's? They believe their God and act accordingly.
They work tirelessly often behind the scenes and spend more money
individually than whole denominations get in tithes to do the will
of the god they serve. Christians? They are stuffed full of
Barbecue and beer staring at the flat panel TV, totally clueless
as to the times are are in. They don't know and many, frankly
don't want to know. Jesus commanded his true servants to watch in
these times. The American Christian thinks he meant the NFL
channel, HBO or a porn site. They don't know better because they
never read their Bibles. They think they know God but like most of
humanity they are deceiving themselves. They want a religion that
makes them comfortable, not one that will save their soul. Deceit
is everywhere and its power these days is not just to deceive but
to destroy any reference to truth.
For many deceivers are
entered into the world, who confess
not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh.
This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
(II John 1:7 [KJVA])
The characteristic of those who oppose God is can be found in this
And it waxed
great, even to the host of heaven; and it cast down
some of the host and of the stars to the ground, and
stamped upon them.
Yea, he magnified himself even to the prince of the host,
and by him the daily sacrifice was taken away, and the
place of his sanctuary was cast down. And an host was
him against the daily sacrifice by reason of
and it cast down the truth to the ground; and it
(Daniel 8:10-12 [KJVA])
What does it mean cast truth down to the ground? It will not be
believed, hidden, mocked and derided while the lie will be
elevated. This is a mechanism for deceit and more and more today,
we are seeing it. The last phrase tells us that it will have enormous
success in its undertakings.
The Pope is listening to the devil. Why is the pope giving heed to
deceiving spirits? This is a subject I have talked about at length
and won't get into here. This Pope is bad news for the little
flock of believers. But he is very appealing to those who have
shown a deep contempt for religion in the past. I heard one person
say to me that this Pope is dragging the Church kicking and
screaming into the 21st century. Well given what has been
happening in the 21st century, I would have to agree, since it was
at his constant insistence that the flood
of Islamic terrorists headed into
Europe and are now wrecking havoc there and he now is
getting input from atheists on Christian teaching. This should not
surprise the few Christians who are wide awake. Many have been
warning that something
evil is taking control of the Vatican. The devil is working
very hard to make the Church into his image and that of the world.
Yet, Jesus Christ told those who love and obey him that we are not
part of this world, but are of another kingdom.
The religion of Gaia? It's real. Those who adhere to those
principles, it's no
conspiracy theory (non-Christians site). This is just the
kind of 'tickle your ears' kind of religion that the devil would
create to get people to follow him and they are doing so in
droves. Keep this in mind going forward as well, this Pope has
rejected the fundamental teachings of scripture and is part of a
network of many various secret societies and is clearly a member
of what many have incorrectly called the illuminati, but in
reality is a close knit body of secret societies who who have
tremendous influence in key realms of human endeavor - Politics,
Banking, Religion, Science, Business. He was placed there by
powerful non-Christians to do their will, rather than God's and
anyone who knows their Bible can see it.
But I don't want to focus in on the Pope. There are other things
that need to be considered.
First we need to understand that whatever is true about man-made
global warming, God has told those who listen to and obey him that
there will be massive environmental changes coming to earth and
great tribulation. The trouble will get so bad that if God did not
shorten the days, no flesh (animal life) would survive it.
Does the bible predict global warming? Actually it does, pretty
clearly and tells us that (physically/environmentally speaking) it
will not be man that causes it but the sun and that it will be so
hot that men will be scorched.
And the fourth
angel poured out his vial upon the sun;
and power was given unto him to scorch men with fire.
And men were scorched with great heat, and blasphemed
the name of God, which hath power over these plagues:
and they repented not to give him glory.
(Revelation of John 16:8-9 [KJVA])
You see, the biblical truth is that the coming global warming is
indeed human induced. We become so wicked and so perverse that God
begins to chastise mankind with the most gruesome plagues to get
us to repent and man in his stubborn wickedness, refuses to.
God has not left us without a witness brothers and sisters. The
Bible talks about a mass die off of sea life in the oceans, it
talks abut massive earthquakes. The Bible is crystal clear, let no
one tell you otherwise, mankind and this earth are heading for
several extinction level events and they are caused not by carbon
emissions, but by our consistent choice to love and do evil.
So to the little flock who have not been deceived by Pope Francis,
the Televangelists who come on the tube and live in multimillion
dollar mansions, the men pleasers who love to tickle the ears of
Christians while they preach a sermon on Sunday morning, I have
this to say.
Change is coming and this earth we walk on will change as well and
not for the better. Deceivers will continue to deceive and
the ignorant will continue to praise ignorance. Lies will be
enthroned and the truth derided and more and more it will seem
like nothing will be able to stop it. We who are wise and know our
God must understand that 'going with the flow' is to invite a
first class ticket on a sleigh ride to hell. Our lives as
Christians are to be kind of counter-culture. We are to be wholly
and completely different than this world and what motivated us
should be pleasing God and not doing what the world expects of us.
We need to be believing God rather than the spirit of this age. To
do this we must be totally transformed in the way we think and see
I beseech you
therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God,
that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy,
acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service
And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed
by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove
what is that good,
and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.
(Romans 12:1-2 [KJVA])
We are to focus in on doing the will of God, not the will of
George Soros or Hans Schellnhuber; and stop being misled by Fox
news and MSNBC.
But I warn you - Truth more and more is going to be
hard to find as the concentration of media
power continues to consolidate. You may think
you know the truth, but what little knowledge you think you
have is often wrong and that is by design.
Let wiser souls consider what I say here. Let those who have
ears to hear, hear. - that will not be many of you,
but it will be some of you - get into your prayer closet and
ask for God's guidance in all things.
Deceit is everywhere and no one out there who has been
deceived knows it until the day his eyes are really opened
and brothers and sisters, that is not many people. How do I
One look at election results in this country and the state
of American Christianity tells me as clearly as the summer
Grace and peace to all who serve our Lord Jesus Christ in
Spirit and in Truth.
5 Jun 2017